|
| 贯通式培养长期质量更高吗？——对不同培养方式的博士科研表现的比较分析 |
| Is the Quality of Successive Cultivation Better?——A Comparative Analysis of Research Performance of Doctoral Students Cultivated in Different Modes |
| 投稿时间：2022-11-08 |
| DOI：10.19834/j.cnki.yjsjy2011.2023.04.05 |
| 中文关键词: 博士培养;科研人员;科研表现 |
| 英文关键词: doctoral training;scientific research personnel;academic performance |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 马缨 | 四川大学 公共管理学院, 成都 610065 | | 赵延东 | 中国人民大学 社会学理论与方法研究中心, 北京 100872 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 830 |
| 全文下载次数: 1190 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 提升博士生培养质量是当前我国高等教育的重要工作。近年来我国越来越多的高校采取贯通式方式培养博士,但目前比较贯通式与阶段式质量的研究不多,在结论上也不统一。更重要的是现有研究都是对在读博士生的质量进行比较,缺乏对博士培养长期质量的考察。本文利用一项对全国科研人员的调查数据,通过追溯他们的博士培养模式,从科研产出和成才概率上对博士生不同培养方式的长期质量差异及影响因素进行分析。研究发现,当仅比较科研产出和成才概率的均值的时候,两种培养模式之间并无显著差异,但在控制了有关因素之后,贯通式培养的质量显著高于阶段式培养。文章还讨论了相关协变量对两种培养模式的影响及机制。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Improving the quality of doctoral education is now an important task for higher education in China. In recent years, more and more universities in China have adopted successive cultivation programs for doctoral students, but at present, there are only a few researches comparing the quality of students trained from the successive cultivation and from the conventional cultivation–separate postgraduate and doctoral education. In addition, the conclusions are different. More critically, the existing studies only compare the quality of doctoral students studying at school, lacking an investigation into the long-term quality of the doctoral student cultivation. Based on the data from a national survey on sci-tech personnel and through tracing their doctoral training patterns, this paper analyzes the long-term quality differences and influencing factors between different doctoral student cultivation methods from the perspective of scientific research output and the probability of those who successfully graduate and become useful talent. The research also finds that there is no significant difference between the two cultivation methods when comparing only the mean value of research output and the probability. However, after "controlling" the related factors, the quality of successive cultivation is significantly higher than that of conventional cultivation. This paper also analyzes the influence and mechanism of relevant covariates on the two cultivation methods. |
|
查看HTML全文
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
